Gun Control

HandgunsI have developed this forum as a means to convey information on the subject of sustainability and being green.  Most view this subject matter to pertain to things that   effects the environment, either with positive or negative results.  But sustainability is also about people and what affects them.  Thus, the pertinence of this topic in this forum.

There is, and has been for many years, a lot of talk about gun control.  To me, gun control was what my father taught me when I was a young boy of around the age of ten.

Grip the pistol lightly with my right hand and just the tip of my index finger on the trigger.  Place the palm of my left hand on the pistol grip with those fingers wrapped around the top of the right hand fingers.  Stand with my feet shoulder width, left leg slightly forward and extend both hands forward.  Pull back slowly and evenly on the trigger.  And practice.

Today, all the rhetoric is not about how you control your gun, but instead about identifying and controlling the violence enacted by criminals and mentally disturbed people with their guns. Something that I think might be a losing battle until the time we are able to master the art of the Vulcan mind meld.

However, short of being able to control the minds of other people, we can control and allow the acquisition of guns by law abiding citizens (e.g. those who do not have a history of social violence, mental illness, or criminal activity).  Now obviously, there will be those that will slip through the system. Just as the saying goes, ‘there are two types of sailboat operators –those who have run aground and –those who about to run aground,’ there are and will be those gun owners who might fit the category of exclusion but have yet to flip the mental switch.

The solution that I speak of is the mandatory registration of all handguns.  (Notice that I said “handguns”). I say handguns because of the fact that those small weapons can be easily concealed and are used in many more crimes than rifles.

So what is the concern here?  Most of what I have been hearing is fear from U.S. citizens that if their gun is registered then the Federal Government will have the ability to come to your home and seize your guns.  Quite frankly, I find that whole concept paranoid and crazy.

The Second Amendment to the Constitution of the United States reads:

A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed. 

This Amendment provides that all citizens (those who have not lost their Constitutional Rights through the Court System) the right to keep and bear arms and that that right cannot be taken away without an Amendment to the Constitution. And if you know anything about the process for amending the Constitution (see below for details), you would know that repealing the Second Amendment would be impossible.  The only other thing that the Federal Government could do would be to declare war on its citizens which I also do not see happening.

Therefore if you a legal, law abiding citizen –you have nothing to lose with stricter laws for the acquisition of a gun.  If you are a law abiding citizen –you have nothing to lose with the stricter tracking of guns.  And, if you are a law abiding citizen –you should have nothing to hide.

Now, let me state that I am not naive enough to think that just because a handgun is registered to someone that it will prevent them from doing bad thing with that weapon.  Not at all!  However, if we start now, by registering all handguns at the point of sale, it will significantly slow the proliferation of illegal (unregistered), handguns from getting onto the streets.  This process will not happen overnight and may in fact be a ten year process, but as more and more handguns are registered it will leave less and less unregistered handguns on the street until the supply is dwindled down to a more manageable number.  And, through this process, at the very least handguns will be traceable back to a person that legally purchased that gun and then either gave it or sold it to someone who in turn does bad things –like go on a shooting spree.  So in turn, the person that gave or sold that weapon to the “bad guy”, could be severely penalized for contributing to a crime or the death of another person.  With this penalty clause in effect, a registered (and legal), gun owner will think twice about selling his gun on the black market.

Is this some sort of euphoric dream?  I don’t think so.

The other day I was listening to an interview of a young man that grew up in the Watts neighborhood of L.A.  He like most of his friends was involved in gang activity even as a very young boy.  He told the interviewer that during times of heightened gang activity he would be given a gun by one of the older members of his gang and told to use it against rival members.  If the gun was used he would “ditch” that gun by literally throwing it away, because it is better not to be caught by the police with a gun and because unregistered guns were plentiful.

Again I say, if we start an aggressive registration program today, ten years from now we may have eliminated 90% of the illegal handguns that are on the street and used by gangs.

The trick is, how do we make it both convenient and affordable for conscientious, law abiding citizens to buy and register handguns.  The simple way would be to authorize licensed gun dealers to process the “legal” registration when they sell a handgun.  Things are so automated these days, with computers and such, that the $25.00 background check fee should include the issuing of a registration card as well.  Once you have one handgun registered, an additional $10.00 registration fee for additional handguns would be a reasonable price to pay to the retailer as a processing fee.  With this system in place, if I wanted to sell one of my registered guns to a friend or stranger, I could go to my local gun dealer, have him be the middle man in the transaction to assure that a proper background check was made and that the registration of that handgun was transferred from me to the new buyer, relieving me of all responsibility of that handgun.  Of course, this can still be done for free at the local police sub-station but for convenience sake, there are many more authorized gun dealers than police sub-stations.

Once we overcome the hurdle of limiting the amount of illegal guns that are on the streets, and have a handle on who owns handguns; we can then address the issue of mental stability/illness and how to record and report persons that appear to have, but not yet openly displayed, violent tendencies, without violating their personal rights.  This will be a much more tedious process and I am sure will include enough lawyers, politicians, and doctors to fill each and every hotel room in Las Vegas.

Craig A. Ruark

Conscientious Handgun Owner

Constitutional Amendments

There are essentially two ways spelled out in the Constitution for how to propose an amendment. One has never been used.

The first method is for a bill to pass both houses of the legislature, by a two-thirds majority in each. Once the bill has passed both houses, it goes on to the states. This is the route taken by all current amendments. Because of some long outstanding amendments, such as the 27th, Congress will normally put a time limit (typically seven years) for the bill to be approved as an amendment (for example, see the 21st and 22nd).

The second method prescribed is for a Constitutional Convention to be called by two-thirds of the legislatures of the States, and for that Convention to propose one or more amendments. These amendments are then sent to the states to be approved by three-fourths of the legislatures or conventions. This route has never been taken, and there is discussion in political science circles about just how such a convention would be convened, and what kind of changes it would bring about.

Regardless of which of the two proposal routes is taken, the amendment must be ratified, or approved, by three-fourths of states. There are two ways to do this, too. The text of the amendment may specify whether the bill must be passed by the state legislatures or by a state convention. See the Ratification Convention Page for a discussion of the makeup of a convention. Amendments are sent to the legislatures of the states by default. Only one amendment, the 21st, specified a convention. In any case, passage by the legislature or convention is by simple majority.

The Constitution, then, spells out four paths for an amendment:

  • Proposal by convention of states, ratification by state conventions (never used)
  • Proposal by convention of states, ratification by state legislatures (never used)
  • Proposal by Congress, ratification by state conventions (used once)
  • Proposal by Congress, ratification by state legislatures (used all other times)

It is interesting to note that at no point does the President have a role in the formal amendment process (though he would be free to make his opinion known). He cannot veto an amendment proposal, or ratification. This point is clear in Article 5, and was reaffirmed by the Supreme Court in Hollingsworth v Virginia (3 US 378 [1798]):

About craigruark

Following a twenty year career in broadcast and print journalism and advertising, Craig became involved in the engineering industry in 1993, providing marketing and business development for geotechnical, environmental, and civil engineering firms. In April 2008 Craig A. Ruark was accredited as a professional under USGBC Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED™). He has a thorough understanding of green building practices and principles established by the US Green Building Council. Craig's responsibilities at NBD include project review for LEED™ compliance with civil engineering projects. He coordinates the document submittal for LEED™ Projects. Assuring all aspects of LEED™ including Sustainable Sites, Water Efficiency, Energy and Atmosphere, Materials and Resources, Indoor Environmental Quality, and Innovation and Design Processes are addressed in the certification submittal to the USGBC. An advocate of sustainability practices, Craig also provides strategic consulting services in the areas of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR), waste minimization and feedstock documentation. With a Craig’s background in broadcasting and print media as well as his basic knowledge of engineering enables him to communicate the details of a project in lay terms for the general public and provides public information/public outreach for major engineering projects. Based upon the scope of the public works project and its effect upon the surrounding community, Craig prepares a plan to strategically inform those persons most likely to be impacted by the project. He is responsible for organizing and conducting public meetings and directs the design and production of printed mailers. Specialties: Sustainable Development Corporate Social Responsability Reporting Technical and Creative Writing LEED Credit Analysis Budget Analysis Project Team Coordination Customer Service
This entry was posted in Constitution Rights, Gun Control. Bookmark the permalink.

6 Responses to Gun Control

  1. I am not convinced that stricter checks and registration will do anything at all to improve the situation. These types of controls tend only to inconvenience law-abiding citizens (think TSA). For a different viewpoint, please see my “Band-Aids Won’t Heal Gun Violence” posts:
    http://creativewildcard.com/band-aids-wont-heal-gun-violence/
    http://creativewildcard.com/band-aids-wont-heal-gun-violence-part-ii/

    • craigruark says:

      Michele,

      You have done a great job of identifying the problems of society and the probable cause of violence in general. However, your solutions are unattainable. We are dealing with human nature and that cannot be changed. If you want to change human behavior you need to take away those things that cause greed and prejudice. We need to eliminate religion and currency for it is those two items alone that have caused more wars and crime than anything else in this world.

      Without religion, there would be no more fighting over so called “Holly Lands,” and prejudice against people of other faith would disappear.

      Without currency, we could eliminate greed. There would not be a class of wealthy or poor or anything in-between. Without currency, all people would live at the same level, and their contribution to society would garner them food and shelter.

      If everyone lived the same and worked the same then there would be nothing to gain through violence or thievery. Or would there? Can there be a Utopia?

      • I am a bit confused, Craig. The gun control debate has focused, in large part, on the rogue, generally mentally disturbed, perpetrators of mass casualties (e.g., Sandy Hook, Tucson, Colorado theater) who use guns to express their ‘dissatisfaction’, if you will, with the world as they know it; my articles were in response to this particular scenario, as it seemed was yours. While I absolutely agree with you that greed and religion are the two most pervasive causes of violence overall (and that a solution is really the question for the ages), both are well beyond the scope of the current situation or what my articles were intended to address. I have other thoughts on those that would take more than a blog post or two to express. :-)

  2. craigruark says:

    Michele,

    We will never be able to prevent the tragic events such as Sandy Hook, Tucson, or the Colorado Theater. Those individuals were obviously very mentally disturbed individuals that plotted their violent acts for long periods of time, gathering both the courage and weapons needed to carry out their vengeance.

    My article addresses the hundreds and thousands of people killed each day on the streets of this country by the gangs and criminals during “drive-by-shootings” or robbery and other such activity. You see these deaths reported daily in the newspapers and television news reports but because they are so common they are practically unnoticed or ignored by the general public. And, in 90% of these cases, the weapons used in these criminal activities are non-registered and illegally purchased hand guns.

    On November 30, 2011 there were 26 people killed in Sandy Hook. Tragic? Yes! Like I stated in my blog, we need to address mental health issues in an attempt to identify those individuals how may go off the deep end and commit such tragic acts of violence.

    However, in this country, one person is killed by a firearm every 17 minutes, 87 people are killed during an average day, and 609 are killed every week. (source: CDC) Between 2000 and 2010, a total of 335,609 people died from guns — more than the population of St. Louis, Mo. (318,069), Pittsburgh (307,484), Cincinnati, Ohio (296,223), Newark, N.J. (277,540), and Orlando, Fla. (243,195) (sources: CDF, U.S. Census; CDC) These are the deaths that can be prevented by greater gun control (e.g. registration and tracking of hand guns, punishment to those people responsible for selling guns to individuals without the proper background check and that gun being used in a crime or shooting, etc.).

  3. Butch Wilfong says:

    and of course as we all know, pencils cause misspelled words.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s